Maybe she considered herself a virgin in relations to rich guys?
But seriously, given the evolutionary psychology of human females: Shouldn’t extremely high attractiveness lead to lower likelihood of promiscuity?
Certainly, it is not always true. But as a rule of thumb, the amount of promiscuity in females should follow a normal distribution. The amount of male attention x inverse sexual market value should maximize promiscuity. Meaning your bog standard solid 7/10 is the likely the segment with the highest body count.
This chain of thought has some weaknesses, though. In fact, it seems like women, by virtue of representing a chance of reproduction for males, consider themselves more attractive than all males. Which makes sense in an ancestral setting, where no investment could necessarily be forced upon a male impregnating a female. The female would ultimately be the responsible for the survival of the offspring and the genes, either by herself, herself and the father or herself and another male.
The point however, would be that for somebody with extremely high SMV like Riley, it would make sense to wait for a guy like Musk (not saying the story is true, but it could be).
While I do admire his work ethic, I do not understand the cult-like following of the kind you seem to subscribe to, as in looking up to Musk's ideas - as if "setting up a colony in space is the only way for humanity to survive". Sorry, not buying that and disagreeing on it, no matter how (supposedly) smart he is (selling himself to the public to be). He does make mistakes, too, some of which very silly, which makes me doubt his plan to "save our species on Mars" is anything more than smart branding.
He also takes bail money from the government, which is funny when you consider his following considers him to be a mastermind CEO. Those kind of events don't even register in the minds of Elon's followers.
FYI, I don't hate the guy. But I think he's very ambivalent. And he hides a lot of usual billionaire bullshit under smart branding.
Maybe she considered herself a virgin in relations to rich guys?
But seriously, given the evolutionary psychology of human females: Shouldn’t extremely high attractiveness lead to lower likelihood of promiscuity?
Certainly, it is not always true. But as a rule of thumb, the amount of promiscuity in females should follow a normal distribution. The amount of male attention x inverse sexual market value should maximize promiscuity. Meaning your bog standard solid 7/10 is the likely the segment with the highest body count.
This chain of thought has some weaknesses, though. In fact, it seems like women, by virtue of representing a chance of reproduction for males, consider themselves more attractive than all males. Which makes sense in an ancestral setting, where no investment could necessarily be forced upon a male impregnating a female. The female would ultimately be the responsible for the survival of the offspring and the genes, either by herself, herself and the father or herself and another male.
The point however, would be that for somebody with extremely high SMV like Riley, it would make sense to wait for a guy like Musk (not saying the story is true, but it could be).
Pretty girls like to fuck too.
The likelihood of a hot actress never fucking is not zero but it's low. Acting is not known for a low-libido field.
It's not impossible, but it's improbable.
While I do admire his work ethic, I do not understand the cult-like following of the kind you seem to subscribe to, as in looking up to Musk's ideas - as if "setting up a colony in space is the only way for humanity to survive". Sorry, not buying that and disagreeing on it, no matter how (supposedly) smart he is (selling himself to the public to be). He does make mistakes, too, some of which very silly, which makes me doubt his plan to "save our species on Mars" is anything more than smart branding.
He also takes bail money from the government, which is funny when you consider his following considers him to be a mastermind CEO. Those kind of events don't even register in the minds of Elon's followers.
FYI, I don't hate the guy. But I think he's very ambivalent. And he hides a lot of usual billionaire bullshit under smart branding.